翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Joseph K. Spiers
・ Joseph K. Yamagiwa
・ Joseph Kabagambe
・ Joseph Kabila
・ Joseph Kabui
・ Joseph Kabwe
・ Joseph Kaeble
・ Joseph Kagan, Baron Kagan
・ Joseph Kahahawai
・ Joseph Kahn
・ Joseph Kahn (disambiguation)
・ Joseph Kahn (journalist)
・ Joseph Kahn (shipping executive)
・ Joseph Kaiha
・ Joseph Kainrad
Joseph Kaipayil
・ Joseph Kaiser
・ Joseph Kalang Tie
・ Joseph Kalathiparambil
・ Joseph Kalichstein
・ Joseph Kalite
・ Joseph Kallarangatt
・ Joseph Kallas
・ Joseph Kallinger
・ Joseph Kalmer
・ Joseph Kam
・ Joseph Kamaru
・ Joseph Kamga
・ Joseph Kaminetsky
・ Joseph Kamotho


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Joseph Kaipayil : ウィキペディア英語版
Joseph Kaipayil

Joseph Kaipayil (b. 1959) is an Indian philosopher, who expounds a relationalist theory of reality. He is professor of philosophy at Jeevalaya Institute of Philosophy, Bangalore.〔 http://independent.academia.edu/JosephKaipayil〕 In his writings one finds a sustained and systematic articulation of relationalism as a distinct philosophical theory. His works include: ''The Epistemology of Comparative Philosophy'' (1995), ''Critical Ontology: An Introductory Essay'' (2002), ''Human as Relational: A Study in Critical Ontology'' (2003), ''An Essay on Ontology'' (2008), and ''Relationalism: A Theory of Being'' (2009).
==Critical Ontology, Ontic Relationalism, and Being-principle==
Critical ontology, ontic relationalism, and Being-principle are the three major concepts found in Kaipayil’s thought.
Building on his basic understanding of philosophy as critical reflection on human experience (to form a rational theory of the world),〔''The Epistemology of Comparative Philosophy ''. Rome: Centre for Indian and Inter-religious Studies, 1995.〕 Kaipayil argues that ontology, the theory of being, (and metaphysics for that matter) should be “critical,” meaning that it should be based on empirical experience. Any ontological and metaphysical postulations we make can claim epistemic justification, only if they are grounded in our experience of the world. In this regard, he agrees with the Kantian critique of human knowledge,〔 As found in Kant’s ''Critique of Pure Reason'' (1781, 1787) 〕 without, however, endorsing its agnosticism about metaphysics. Kaipayil further describes ontology as investigation of the being-principle of things.〔 ''Critical Ontology''. Bangalore: JIP Publications, 2002. 〕〔 ''Human as Relational''. Bangalore: JIP Publications 2003. 〕
Coming to his relationalist thought, Kaipayil presents relationalism mainly as a theory of being, which addresses the metaphysical problem of the one and the many, i.e. the unity and the plurality of the world. His theory of being, which he prefers to call ontic relationalism, interprets the meaning of being in terms of the particular in its relationality. Entities are constituted by their multiple relationalities. According to ontic relationalism, particulars interrelate and constitute what we call reality.〔 ''An Essay on Ontology''. Kochi: Karunikan Books, 2008.〕〔 Relationalism: A Theory of Being''. Bangalore: JIP Publications, 2009. 〕
Integral to Kaipayil’s theory of being is his concept of Being-principle, conceived as the unity of the three primal principles - existence, intelligence, and force. Beings (particulars) are thought to be ontologically grounded in Being-principle, the supreme particular, and its radical relationality.〔 Relationalism: A Theory of Being'' 〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Joseph Kaipayil」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.